more of the same because the more I look at the whole AIDS issue the more a lot of the mainstream conclusions do not make sense. Coupled with the mountain of evidence from the scientific community named the ‘HIV dissidents’ It is essential for the sake of humanity, we need to re-examine the facts regarding the most dreaded disease facing the world.

The AIDS dogma and its grip on the public consciousness

A conscious campaign program has been unleashed on the public. We are made to believe that the HIV virus is deadly and can cause the entire immune system to collapse, that once infected death by AIDS is certain. There are anti viral drugs such as A.Z.T , D.D. C and D.D.I that is said to slow the progression of the disease but they are highly toxic and can actually bring the unset of AIDS itself.

Below are some essential questions that needs urgent answers

First, after spending billions of dollars, H.I.V. researchers are still unable to explain how the H.I.V., a retrovirus with a very simple genetic organization, damages the entire immune system, and there seems to be no means to stop it. The present stalemate contrasts dramatically with the confidence expressed in 1984 by Dr Gallo-the chief architect of the HIV-AIDS hypothesis and the then Secretary of health Margaret Heckler announced the probable cause of AIDS has been discovered, At that time Gallo thought the virus killed cells directly by infecting them, and the U.S. government officials predicted a vaccine would be available in two years. Twenty five years on, no vaccine is in sight, and the certainty about how the virus destroys the immune system is yet to be resolved. Could we be barking up the wrong tree?

Second, Over 4,000 scientists including two Nobel peace prize winners, eminent virologist and immunologist question the HIV/AIDS hypothesis. Why hasn’t their findings made public if truly we are looking for answers?

Third, predictions based on the H.I.V. epidemic theory have failed spectacularly. For instance, AIDS in the United States and Europe has not spread through to the general population. Instead, twenty five years on, it still remains almost entirely confined to the original risk groups-mainly sexually promiscuous gay men, homophiliacs and intravenous drug abusers. The H.I.V infection rate among Americans has increased more slowly rather than increasing rapidly as predicted, which suggests that at best H.I.V. is an old virus that has been with us for hundreds of years without causing an epidemic.

Fourth, a new dimension into diagnosis has entered into medical practice with AIDS, where a person with a certain type of symptoms is said to have a disease. AIDS without H.I.V. is especially prevalent in Africa, where being H.I.V.-positive is not even a factor in diagnosis. The definition of AIDS in Africa is fundamentally different than the definition of AIDS that is used in the West. If an African is diagnosed with the following clinical symptoms-a persistent cough, a high fever, chronic diarrhea, a ten-percent weight loss in the last two months-and lives in Africa that person has AIDS, irrespective of any other possible disease such as dysentery, malaria or T.B. Never the less, Western scientists claim that 85 percent of the African population is positive for H.I.V anti bodies, when tests are rarely, if ever, performed. How can they make such conclusions?

Lastly, HIV-AIDS has the hallmarks of a disease that most terrorises the minds of people with whom it affects their way of life. Since we are told that HIV the virus that causes AIDS can be spread by sexual intercourse- an activity most adults find extremely pleasurable, it has thus made the public respond in a manner quite unlike any other disease. However, that doesn’t quite hold up. There is, in fact, no support for the idea that AIDS is a sexually transmitted disease anywhere in the world. For example-people who are diagnosed as having AIDS but whose partners remain uninfected. There are thousands of these. One of the most famous examples is Arthur Ashe. He had H.I.V. for ten years and died of AIDS, but his wife and daughter are both H.I.V.-negative…. There are 15,000 American haemophiliacs who are H.I.V-positive, and there isn’t one study that shows that the wives of haemophiliacs get AIDS from their partners. Why is this so?

So many unanswered questions but we must seek answers to them. According Albert Einstein the greatest scientist of the last century, ”the important thing is never stop questioning”
Is there a possibility that everything we thought about AIDS is wrong? According to Neville Hodgkinson of the Sunday Times London, wrote an article on April 26th 1992 stating ”If HIV does not cause AIDS….then we will have witnessed the biggest medical and scientific blunder of this century. I cannot agree with him more.

Bolaji Alli is the founder and CEO of Holistic Miracles, an international organisation committed to empowering the physical well being of humanity. He has spent the last twenty years researching into various areas of alternative healing meth